Mutual Monitoring within Top Management Teams: A Structural Modeling Investigation
نویسنده
چکیده
Mutual monitoring as a solution to moral hazard has been extensively studied by theorists. However, do shareholders actually take advantage of mutual monitoring among executives to design individual compensation? This paper non-parametrically identi es and tests three structural models of principal-multiagent moral hazard using the data of S&P1500 rms from 1993 to 2005. The Mutual Monitoring with Individual Utility Maximization Model is the most plausible one to rationalize the data. The No Mutual Monitoring Model is also plausible but relies on the assumption that managers have heterogeneous risk preferences across rm characteristics. The Mutual Monitoring with Total Utility Maximization Model is rejected by the data. This paper indicates that shareholders seem to recognize and exploit complementary incentive mechanisms, such as mutual monitoring among self-interested top executives, to design compensation. Keywords: Mutual Monitoring, Moral Hazard, Top Management Team, Executive Compensation, Semiparametric Identi cation, Structural Estimation, Moment Inequalities. I am indebted to my dissertation committee George-Levi Gayle, Jonathan Glover (co-chair), Pierre Jinghong Liang, and Robert Miller (co-chair) for their invaluable guidance and support. I also thank Michael Ewens, Diane Denis, Douglas Schroeder, Jack Stecher, Ran Zhao, and seminar participants at Carnegie Mellon for their comments. All errors are my own. Li is a Ph.D. candidate in accounting at Carnegie Mellon University. E-mail: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Essays on the Structural Models of Executive Compensation
This dissertation is composed of three chapters in which I use both reduced-form approach and structural approach to study executive compensation in S&P1500 rms from 1993 to 2005. Chapter 1 provides the literature and methodology background of this dissertation. I summarize existing accounting empirical studies on executive compensation under two tasks, that is, (1) testing contract theory and...
متن کاملSupplier Development Activities and Buying Firm’s Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Iranian SMEs
This study attempts to investigate the major antecedent factors that influence manufacturing SMEs intentions toward the implementation of supplier development activities in Iranian SMEs. In order to achieve this objective, the research constructs were developed. The conceptual framework underlying this study was based on the theories of supplier development activities and social capital. These...
متن کاملShort-lived Teams with Mutual Monitoring∗
We show that the free-riding problem in short-lived teams is not as severe as previously thought. Two critical conditions are: team members can observe each other’s effort periodically, which makes mutual monitoring possible; technology is convex (increasing marginal returns) or has a “completion benefit.” In principal-agent settings, mutual monitoring reduces the necessary wage payment to indu...
متن کاملTop Management Teams and Firm Internationalization: an Investigation of Japanese Firms
Lohrke and Burton (Lohrke & Burton, 1997), in their review of leading international business and strategic management journals, noted that studies of top management teams (TMTs) have been quite rare in the international strategic management literature. Following the upper echelons perspective (Hambrick & Mason, 1984), recent work has attempted to bridge this gap by studying TMTs in the context ...
متن کاملModeling the Barriers
The purpose of this paper is to present an approach for modeling the barriers of information sharing (IS) in supply chain (SC) by developing the relationship between various information sharing barriers (ISBs). Using interpretive structural modeling (ISM), the result shows a hierarchy-based model and the mutual relationships among the ISBs. The result shows that there is a group of ISBs having ...
متن کامل